Comparing Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright Testing Tools
✅ Selenium vs Cypress vs Playwright
Feature / Tool Selenium Cypress Playwright
Language Support Java, Python, C#, Ruby, JS, Kotlin JavaScript, TypeScript JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, C#, Java
Architecture Works outside the browser (uses WebDriver) Runs inside the browser Works outside the browser, uses its own API
Cross-browser Testing ✅ Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge ⚠️ Limited (Chrome, Edge, Firefox only) ✅ Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
Mobile Testing ✅ Supports Appium ❌ Not supported ❌ Not directly supported
Speed Slower (depends on WebDriver) Very fast (browser-native) Very fast (parallel execution, headless)
Ease of Setup Moderate Easy (built-in runner) Easy
Test Runner Needs TestNG, JUnit, etc. Built-in Built-in
Parallel Execution Complex to configure Supports it with plugins ✅ Built-in
Debugging Support Console logs, screenshots Time-travel UI, easy debugging Rich logs, trace viewer, screenshots
Community & Maturity Very mature and large community Growing fast, smaller community Growing fast, backed by Microsoft
Best For Enterprise-level, cross-platform tests Frontend unit & integration tests Modern, cross-browser end-to-end testing
๐ Summary
Selenium is best for enterprise-grade, cross-language and cross-platform automation, especially if mobile automation (with Appium) is needed.
Cypress is ideal for frontend developers testing modern JavaScript apps with fast, in-browser execution and great debugging tools.
Playwright is great for modern end-to-end testing, with powerful automation capabilities and support for multiple languages and browsers out-of-the-box.
Learn Testing Tools Training in Hyderabad
Read More
Essential Tools Every QA Should Know
How to Choose the Right Testing Tool for Your Project
Visit Our IHUB Talent Training Institute in Hyderabad
Comments
Post a Comment